Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 16 results ...

Abdirad, H and Dossick, C S (2019) Normative and descriptive models for COBie implementation: discrepancies and limitations. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(08), 1820–36.

Almarri, K, Alzahrani, S and Boussabaine, H (2019) An evaluation of the impact of risk cost on risk allocation in public private partnership projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(08), 1696–711.

Anson, M, Ying, K T and Siu, M F (2019) Analytical models towards explaining the difficulty in efficiently matching site concrete supply resources with placing crew needs. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(08), 1672–95.

Antwi-Afari, M F, Li, H, Wong, J K, Oladinrin, O T, Ge, J X, Seo, J and Wong, A Y L (2019) Sensing and warning-based technology applications to improve occupational health and safety in the construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(08), 1534–52.

Au-Yong, C P, Chua, S J L, Ali, A S and Tucker, M (2019) Optimising maintenance cost by prioritising maintenance of facilities services in residential buildings. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(08), 1593–607.

Charkhakan, M H and Heravi, G (2019) Evaluating the preventability of conflicts arising from change occurrence in construction projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(08), 1777–800.

Gao, J, Ren, H, Ma, X, Cai, W and Shi, Q (2019) A total energy efficiency evaluation framework based on embodied energy for the construction industry and the spatio-temporal evolution analysis. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(08), 1652–71.

He, Q, Wang, T, Chan, A P, Li, H and Chen, Y (2019) Identifying the gaps in project success research. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(08), 1553–73.

Hilali, A, Charoenngam, C and Barman, A (2019) Barriers in contractual scope management of international development projects in Afghanistan. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(08), 1574–92.

Hopkin, T, Lu, S, Sexton, M and Rogers, P (2019) Learning from defects in the UK housing sector using action research. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(08), 1608–24.

Jin, R, Zou, Y, Gidado, K, Ashton, P and Painting, N (2019) Scientometric analysis of BIM-based research in construction engineering and management. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(08), 1750–76.

Liang, R and Chong, H (2019) A hybrid group decision model for green supplier selection: a case study of megaprojects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(08), 1712–34.

Murillo, K P, Rocha, E and Rodrigues, M F (2019) Construction sectors efficiency analysis on seven European countries. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(08), 1801–19.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: Optimization; International construction; Construction; Productivity; Strategic management; Estimating;
  • ISBN/ISSN: 0969-9988
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-07-2018-0287
  • Abstract:
    The purpose of this paper is to measure and compare the technical efficiency of construction companies in seven European countries: Austria, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Portugal and Spain, during the 2008–2015 period. The analysis involves nine sectors grouped into three divisions: construction of buildings (F41), civil engineering (F42) and specialized construction activities (F43), by NACE classification. Design/methodology/approach Multidirectional efficiency analysis was adopted to investigate the levels of efficiencies, the differences in those levels and the possible causes of such differences by further defining two new indices. Findings It showed that F43 is the most efficient division during the study period, followed by F42 and F41. The sectors/countries with less efficiency are: construction of roads and railways/Poland, construction of other civil engineering projects/Hungary, demolition and site preparation/Poland, other specialized construction activities/Portugal. Globally, the development of building projects sector uses resources in the most inefficient way and there was a drop in the efficiency in 2011 and 2013, showing a delay in the crisis impact. After 2010, civil engineering projects required a substantial effort to access resources. Other features regarding (in)efficiency were further identified. Originality/value The analysis was conducted with one of the most effective techniques in frontier analysis. The first introduced index allows for comparing efficient/inefficient subgroups, and the other index measures the resource acquisition effort, allowing a better comparison along years. The study provides a good understanding of the performance of the construction industry and indirectly exposes the strategies to overcome the crisis, through the identification of the inputs/outputs which are well/badly used.

Park, E, Kwon, S J and Han, J (2019) Antecedents of the adoption of building information modeling technology in Korea. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(08), 1735–49.

Rajagopalan, G (2019) Durability of alumina silicate concrete based on slag/fly ash blends against corrosion. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(08), 1641–51.

Silverio-Fernandez, M A, Renukappa, S and Suresh, S (2019) Evaluating critical success factors for implementing smart devices in the construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(08), 1625–40.